Table of Contents
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) stands as one of the most significant and yet elusive pieces of legislation in the history of the United States. First proposed almost a century ago, the ERA was intended to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens, irrespective of sex. Despite its long journey through the political landscape, the amendment has sparked debates about gender equality, constitutional law, and the need for enduring social progress.
The Birth of the Equal Rights Amendment
The Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced to Congress by suffragist and women’s rights activist Alice Paul in 1923, nearly three years after women won the right to vote with the passage of the 19th Amendment. Paul’s vision for the ERA was clear: a constitutional guarantee of gender equality. The initial wording of the amendment was simple yet profound:
“Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
The amendment was designed to eliminate any legal distinctions between men and women in terms of rights and protections, ensuring that gender could not be used as a basis for discriminatory laws.
The ERA’s Legislative Journey
Despite its early introduction, the ERA did not gain significant momentum until the 1970s, when the feminist movement revived the push for gender equality. In 1972, after nearly five decades of political lobbying, the ERA passed both houses of Congress with overwhelming support. The amendment was then sent to the states for ratification, where it required the approval of three-fourths (38) of the state legislatures to become part of the U.S. Constitution.
By 1977, 35 states had ratified the ERA, just three short of the required number. However, opposition to the amendment grew stronger in the years that followed, especially among conservative groups who feared the social implications of such a sweeping change. The most prominent among these was Phyllis Schlafly, a political activist who argued that the ERA would undermine traditional family structures, lead to unisex bathrooms, and disadvantage women in certain legal contexts. This backlash led to the amendment’s failure to achieve ratification by the 1982 deadline set by Congress.
The ERA in Contemporary America
While the ERA fell short of ratification in the 1970s and 1980s, the conversation surrounding gender equality did not end. In recent years, the amendment has experienced a resurgence, fueled by a renewed focus on women’s rights and the changing political climate. In 2017, Nevada became the 36th state to ratify the ERA, and in 2018, Illinois followed suit. The momentum continued in 2020, when Virginia became the 38th and final state needed to ratify the amendment.
However, legal and procedural questions remain about whether the 38th state’s ratification is valid, given that the amendment’s original deadline had passed. Some argue that the deadline is a technical barrier that should be disregarded, while others contend that the ratification process must start anew. As of January 2025, the matter is still being litigated in the courts, and the future of the ERA remains uncertain.
Why the ERA Matters
The Equal Rights Amendment is more than just a piece of historical legislation—its potential impact on the lives of all Americans, particularly women, cannot be overstated. Proponents of the ERA argue that it would:
- Provide Constitutional Protection Against Gender Discrimination: While there are existing federal laws that prohibit gender discrimination, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Pay Act, these protections are not enshrined in the Constitution. The ERA would ensure that gender equality is a fundamental constitutional principle, elevating it to the highest level of legal protection.
- Affirm Women’s Legal and Economic Rights: Despite significant strides in gender equality, women still face disparities in income, healthcare, and access to opportunities in the workplace and beyond. The ERA could be a powerful tool for addressing these inequalities by providing a constitutional basis for challenging laws or practices that perpetuate gender-based discrimination.
- Set a Precedent for Future Legal Progress: By ensuring that gender discrimination is not tolerated, the ERA could provide a framework for continued legal reforms aimed at achieving full gender equality. In a broader context, the passage of the ERA could pave the way for other constitutional amendments that address evolving social issues.
Opposition and Misconceptions
Critics of the ERA often argue that it is unnecessary, pointing to existing laws that already prohibit discrimination based on sex. They suggest that the amendment could lead to unintended consequences, such as the redefinition of marriage or the expansion of government interference in private relationships. Some believe that it could undermine laws that specifically protect women, such as those relating to pregnancy and motherhood.
TO WATCH THE VIDEO CLICK HERE
Furthermore, some argue that the political and social climate in the United States has already evolved to the point where legal equality between the sexes is a given. In this view, the passage of the ERA might be seen as redundant, given that gender equality has increasingly been addressed through legislative reforms and court rulings.
However, proponents of the ERA counter these arguments by emphasizing that laws and court decisions can be overturned or changed over time. The Constitution, they argue, provides an enduring safeguard that would prevent any future rollback of women’s rights and solidify gender equality as a core principle of American democracy.
Looking Ahead: The Future of the Equal Rights Amendment
While the passage of the ERA remains uncertain, its re-emergence in contemporary political discourse speaks to the ongoing fight for gender equality. Public support for the ERA has increased in recent years, particularly among younger generations, who view it as a necessary step in addressing the persistent challenges women face in achieving full equality. Many argue that the time has come to finally put the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution and send a clear message that gender discrimination is unacceptable in any form.
As the courts, Congress, and state legislatures continue to grapple with the legal and procedural aspects of the ERA, one thing is clear: the conversation about gender equality in the United States is far from over. Whether or not the Equal Rights Amendment ultimately becomes law, its enduring significance lies in its role as a touchstone for the ongoing struggle for equal rights for all Americans, regardless of sex.
In this ongoing debate, the future of the ERA—and the cause of gender equality—remains a defining issue of the 21st century. The movement for equality continues to evolve, with activists, lawmakers, and citizens pushing for systemic change that will ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender, are treated with the dignity, respect, and fairness they deserve under the law.
TO EXPLORE MORE TOPICS CLICK HERE
